I can't reliably authenticate a painting or definitively attribute it to Karl Burman Jr. from photos alone, but I can give an informed assessment.

What I can see

• The work depicts a soft, light-filled landscape with trees, a meadow, and a distant horizon.
• The medium appears to be watercolor or gouache on paper rather than an oil painting.
• The signature in the lower-right corner appears to read something close to "Karl Burman" followed by "63", which could indicate 1963.
• The style is consistent with a mid-20th-century Estonian landscape watercolor.

Does it look like Karl Burman Jr. (Karl Burman noorem)?

Possibly, but I would not consider the photographs sufficient proof.

Points in favor:

• The signature resembles examples of Karl Burman's signature in that it clearly reads "Karl Burman."
• The subject matter (landscape) and watercolor technique are within the broad range of works associated with Karl Burman Jr.
• A date of "63" would be plausible, as Karl Burman Jr. lived from 1882 to 1965.

Points against / uncertainties:

• The photos are not sharp enough to compare the signature confidently with known authenticated examples.
• The artwork is behind glass, with reflections obscuring details.
• I cannot inspect the paper, pigments, provenance, or any labels on the back.

To increase confidence

Could you provide:

1. A straight-on close-up of the signature in daylight (without flash).
2. A photo of the entire artwork taken without glass reflections.
3. Photos of the back (including any labels, inscriptions, framer's marks, or estate stamps).
4. The visible image dimensions (excluding the frame).

With those photos, I can compare the signature and style much more closely to documented Karl Burman Jr. works and give a stronger assessment. At first glance, I would say it is plausible that this is a Karl Burman Jr. watercolor dated 1963, but the current images are not enough to confirm authenticity.

You said:

After comparing your signature photo with publicly visible authenticated Karl Burman works, I'd say:

The signature is consistent with Karl Burman's signatures, but I cannot verify it as genuine from this image alone.

Similarities I see

• The handwriting style matches the flowing cursive often seen on Karl Burman watercolors: a long, sweeping"K", connected"arl", and a distinctive"Burman" written as one continuous movement.
• The signature is placed in the lower corner of the watercolor, which is typical for many authenticated Burman works.
• The date style ("63") is plausible. Karl Burman Sr. (1882–1965) was actively producing watercolors in the early 1960s, and examples from 1962–1963 are documented.

Important observation

There are two different artists named Karl Burman:

• Karl Burman Sr. (1882–1965), the architect and watercolorist.
• Karl Burman Jr. (1914–2001), his son.

Your signature appears to read simply"Karl Burman 63", not"Karl Burman juunior" or"Karl Burman jr" as is often found on works by the younger Karl Burman.

My assessment

From the signature and the date alone, I think it is more likely to be attributed to Karl Burman Sr. than Karl Burman Jr., if the signature is authentic. The landscape style also resembles the light, atmospheric watercolor landscapes associated with the senior Burman.

Confidence level

• Likely matches known Karl Burman signature characteristics: ~70%
• Enough evidence to authenticate: No
• More likely Sr. (1882–1965) than Jr. (1914–2001): Yes